Jump to content
Server time (UTC): 2021-02-25, 01:31


  • Rank

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Newcomer

Account information

  • Whitelisted NO


Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The AI-Heli evac works incredibly smoothly, very nice system. Also, we 'interrogated' some terrorist sympathisers earlier:
  2. Idea 2 is just as it is now, there won't be any new motivation to play. Idea 1 is best to fast-track the wipe and perhaps the fresh start may bring back the needed amount of players.
  3. This mod is a lot of fun, especially when there's a large group of people on. The patrols recently have been really intense, and the firefights can go on for a long time which is a great thing. Keep up the good work Sauce and Team
  4. This is like an upgraded version of Tac-Domination from Arma2, I'm hyped
  5. Hey staff team I got a glitch too, says I have 3 warnings points on my profile? Weird.
  6. Been happening for a long time and it won't stop until some real change is made to staff mentality. There's a saying around this community which is "Pat on the back" which translate into 'staff (moderators) give out pointless warnings/points to make it seem like they're doing staff work, in desperate attempts to get promoted'. Doesn't occur from all moderators but within my time in this community I've seen it happen and received points/bans in similar situations.
  7. Link to the source of punishment (report/post): Why the verdict is not fair: I was explaining my point perfectly well, in response to Speedster's controversial comment regarding NVFL I decided to sum up my point in a swift manner, seeing as the thread was already a hot topic. That point being that NVFL isn't a numbers game and that I can show Speedster how one person (me) can go against him and three of his friends in a non-compliance scenario. We would use room 4 on the TS to communicate and set up this scenario where I can show him my ways of surviving a 4v1. Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view: My post was very quickly snipped and warned which leads me to believe Shadows hadn't completely understood my point and instead swooped in with the points to get that "pat on the back". Which lead me to repost with a much more complicated way of explaining the very same point I had written in my first post: What would you like to achieve with this appeal: Removal of points. What could you have done better?:
  8. Seeing as my post was quickly snipped and warned due to it not following the guidelines of the staff team. I will now repost it in a format that they can understand, and I don't receive any points. There are many situations where a player can easily take on more than one enemy, for example; having sufficient cover or slightly better aim/weapon. There are many other factors that can massively change the odds of who comes out alive. You can't base it purely on a numbers game because not every player in a gunfight trades kills, In a firefight I will often gain 2-3+ kills dependent on the situation, there are other times I will die immediately. My death may come from another player's bullet, or I may trip on some stairs, does that mean I didn't value my life? No . So you saying what I've quoted is completely wrong. If you would like to hear more from my point, please enter room 4 with three other community members where I shall present to you a noncompliance situation where NVFL shall be null.
  9. -User was warned for this post-
  10. "In the given situation" It was a light hearted joke that Hollows overreacted to, he didn't follow staff procedure and now you're covering for him with some bullshit excuse. My appeal hasn't even been looked at where I shouldn't have even been banned in the first place. Yet in the future it won't happen again? In that statement you're saying that it was wrong to do so, so why am I not unbanned? It was Shadow who messaged me first with the message "Mr. Hatch" - Seeing that I thought he was having a laugh so I responded in that way. Then Hollow comes out of nowhere just to get that ban in to receive those special brownie points. You don't get a valid promotion in staff by machine gunning out petty bans and warning points, you get to a high position by bringing in respectful and contributing opinions that benefit the community. For example, take a look at ex-admins such as Shark and Roman, they got promoted to admin pretty fast and everyone knew they earnt that position. Take that as your feedback Hollow.
  11. Link to the source of punishment (report/post): Why the verdict is not fair: Should've got a kick first then a ban Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view: Was hanging with the bois and some staff decided to make some trouble in my neighbourhood, I responded in a light hearted way and they banned me What would you like to achieve with this appeal: Regain access to the Teamspeak server What could you have done better?:
  • Create New...