BET.

The only way that roleplay will ever change is if the staff enforce different kinds of roleplay, characters, groups, etc. A lore wipe is a good time to practice such enforcement, but the lore does not always make the roleplay. It always boils down to the player, and this community is stubborn in that fact. I voted yes on the pretense that staff actually ENFORCE change.

WIP.

Having two servers is nice and all, but it makes server pop a drag sometimes. One server or the other can usually be full, and a full server means more player interaction. Go one or the other. I wouldn't personally be opposed to having something new with Livonia only.

Halo 1 best weapon is pistol try and convince me otherwise.

Maybe again someday. We spoiled people with that shit.

Hallo. EDIT: omg I gave you your first bean since return. I feel honored.

Just spit-balling ideas, because stuff like this has been discussed in the past. 1. Maybe not forced PK on firefights, but forced PK on execution can stay. Characters being forced PK on a firefight seems kinda iffy, even if both parties agree. 2. War should also not be determined by a single firefight. War can last a certain period of time, and groups can also opt to surrender. Regardless of a surrender or a forcible loss in the war, the result always ends in the group archiving. It's easier to archive a group than it is to permadeath a character, in my eyes, and seems like more a fair option. This puts the focus more on RP, forces groups to decide between the group as a whole and it's goals/survival or the lives of the characters they've been sharing their story with. It also makes the PK more about the hostile experience of capture and execution rather than just dropping a bunch of people in a firefight and calling it an easy clap and archive of a group/characters. Regardless of the outcome, some sort of war system should be and always should have been apart of this server to bring a means to an end for conflict within RP. So +1 to the overall idea.