Jump to content
Server time: 2018-10-22, 13:14 WE ARE RECRUITING

Sylvester Todd

Donor
  • Content Count

    675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Sylvester Todd

  1. Hi, I'm your friendly neighborhood idiot. If you want me to make you some stuff, just ask me. Send me a pm and an idea of what you're looking for, whether it be signatures or covers or a shitty avatar, I'll make trash so good you'll think its recycling I draw shit, and goof around with junk in photoshop Examples of the trash I've made Also they are mostly out of chronological order If you're asking me to do a thing, give me references, and be specific about your request if you've got something in mind, and I'm no pro or nothin' so just like don't expect too much outta me In any case, this gives me practice at the draw stuff and photoshlop and all that good stuff Reply to the thread or send me a pm, whatever's good my dude More stuff
  2. There are more. I just never got around to uploading them to SC, so they're still uploaded somewhere out in the void
  3. Bid dump Complete Nothing is in chronological order Figure I might as well upload my radio posts
  4. Link to the source of punishment (report/post): Why the verdict is not fair: So heres the thing, you could say my post was unnecessary. and that it was "Flooding the page with memes", but what about all of these "unnescary posts" that contributed nothing to the discussion other than saying "No, I'd rather not" or just a meme, or "Yeah, sounds cool". What made mine different? The Meme and the negative connection with it? Seems a little ridiculous. Could you say it was flaming? I don't think so it's a stretch, quite a far stretch, flaming requires one to be antagonistic in their actions. In the spoiler are some similar posts, that did not receive points, around 15 others. Now if you're thinking, "Todd we're talking about you here, not these people" Well you're right but, you see this is supporting evidence to my argument, all of these are images of people posting either a meme, and a short line or one or the other, now this lead me to believe posting this: Was acceptable, because so many others before me had done similarly to what I had done. Now the thing about giving points to "Unnecessary posts" is you gotta keep things consistent. What was different about mine, what garnered the points where others should also have received points? Not to say that I think these examples above me deserve points, that would be ridiculous, they're small jokes or simple comments, do they contribute to the discussion? Not really, but stuff like this happens all the time in pretty much every thread, so really it should't matter.. Rather I shouldn't have any points, I shouldn't have even received any points for making a simple post with an image I doodle saying "Thanks but no thanks", if anything it was a tad more polite than a few. So why did those other posts get a pass and I didn't? If your argument is that I don't play often enough, well I'm still a member of the community, and it shouldn't matter that I'm not super active, it should be a non-issue. In any case, I shouldn't have been given warning points in the first place. Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view: It's all in the above post. What would you like to achieve with this appeal: Removal of points, and re-posting my original post. What could you have done better?: Pretty much nothing other than be silent, but I mean what about the others who had done the same thing, I was lead to believe this post was acceptable so I posted it.
  5. Sylvester Todd

    PsiSyn back in DayZRP.

    -USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST-
  6. Sylvester Todd

    One Group

    you know what it is
  7. Sylvester Todd

    Hey it’s me

  8. Lasted a good 4 years though, so this is a good sign, and SCUM's development team is competent, I've kept up on them. It would be a miracle for DayZ to get back even a quarter of their numbers back for a significant amount of time when .63 comes out.
  9. Sylvester Todd

    New rules and whitelist

    e x c i t e
  10. Sylvester Todd

    New rules draft

    Are the rules actually going to change? Or is it just gonna be you make a vote to garner interest and then say "You know what, nahh". And I mean if people are making snarky comments, perhaps its because there are issues with the system that have ruined peoples trust in it? And telling people not to vote or comment in something that you specifically reach out to the community for seems a bit odd, like you don't want to hear some peoples thoughts. Even if you don't like it, its valid. But for any other additional rule changes, bring back dynamics. It made things much more fluid, and just enjoyable in general, specially for new players who aren't familiar with groups.
  11. Sylvester Todd

    Fallout 76 Thread

    I think it was receiving negativity because no one was quite certain how they would handle the multiplayer, I had heard it would be similar to an MMO or a rust clone, and various other things. I had thought they were intending it to be something like ESO, which I'm not much of a fan of personally. But there was so much misinformation and rumors around it so I couldn't be certain of what was true. Now based on what I've seen, I think it will be a goodun.
  12. Sylvester Todd

    Fallout 76 Thread

    That god damn tank in fallout 76, I'm ready for concrete to be thrown down my windpipe
  13. Sylvester Todd

    #Bring-back-dynamics

    Can't wait to see a million messages that say they're initiating, makes it handy so everyone knows who is involved, which makes it easier for everyone in staff in case of reports. I've never been much of a sniper man, so I guess overwatch for dynamics would have to climb out of the trees and get their hands dirty with everyone else
  14. Shame I was too busy keep giving Nipplehat a hard time, but my joke stuck with him until the end, so that's pretty good
  15. Sylvester Todd

    Should Anarchy Be Official?

    I haven't been super active no lie, I don't know whats going on, but from an outside perspective because I'm certainly not in the loop, is that a large hostile group without a large enemy doesn't seem like a great idea. It seems to me that the environment for large scale hostile stuff isn't in the cards at the moment. Maybe it is depending on how things go, I have a few ideas on how it could run. But I think smaller scale hostilities are more of a fit currently because y'know one server, and the player base isn't as big as it used to be, and whether it bounces back or not I'm not sure. But it's not really our decision to make. You do what you like, do it your way and you'll probably be more content with the results.
  16. I graduate college today. see you folks in game soon
×