Link to the situation: See @Tiviyl's screenshot of the warning message.
Any supporting evidence or notes: Mentioned above.
Feedback: First off you have my apologies for the timing of this feedback, as it may come across as negativity bandwagoning, which I would like to assure you that that is not my intention with this feedback. It is obvious that Tiviyl does not know how reported posts are handled within the staff team, or he is simply feigning ignorance to make the staff team seem tyrannical in nature.
My feedback boils down to the lack of evidence that appears in the warning message. As a former staff member I'm very well aware of the contextual evidence that often surrounds flamebaiting and how important it is to analyse it, as well as procuring it in the first place should it exist. However, it seems as though no evidence of wrongdoing was produced in the warning message, there seems to be no link between his post and an outstanding issue with a community member/members. I trust the regular staff team to do the fact-finding and not simply point because they believe something is rulebreaking, though it would also be good to have evidence presented in the actual warning message.
Again, you have my apologies for the feedback's timing, I just felt it was important to bring up this issue for clarification.
Suggestions for improvement: Support your conclusion with the evidence you used to come to the aforementioned conclusion.