Nah, you misunderstood me - by my fix I meant that current shitstorm about some radical islamic organisation ransacking Iraq would not have occured if Murica & allies havent illegally invaded.
TBH, ISIS havoc is kinda a kick in nuts for USA foreign policy in that region which is nice (only in geopolitic terms) but it's shamefully paid in price of all innocent Iraqi (and citizens of other close countries) blood. If Hussein was in power this would not have happened.
Okay actually, a question. Explain to me exactly how us invading caused all this shit to happen. No disrespect intended, I'm just curious, because when I ask most people this they just give me some bullshit "Fuck America" answer that has no intellectual meaning whatsoever. Because to be quite honest, ISIS isn't even fighting us, they're, well, killing Christians and those who don't convert to Islam(Well, their version of it). Idk how WE caused that..
Well, that is a weird question indeed but mkay -
Illegal invasion made by USA & its allies pretty much annihilated Iraq military forces and government there was right ? Iraq beforehand had some personnel to defend itself, of course when compared to invading forces it would crumble like it did but against some relatively lowtech terrorist organisations they would highly likely stand their ground. Defending forces would not allow for ISIS to spread all over and do what they like as any failure to stop them would directly affect stability of power Hussein had which he would try to maintain at all cost. USA & Co are effectively shrinking their personnel numbers each year + their nature of mission has changed - from combat to more of a peacekeeping nature.
Currently USA & Co have ISIS problem, as they were supposed to leave the area due to financial & political issues. They tried to 'prep' local forces but it seems to be a failed task due to their low motivation. Allied soldiers can't be directly involved much longer while lack of support would leave Iraq in flames & ruins with ISIS rolling around which would be a disastrous political failure. Furthermore what makes the situation worse for puppet USA & Co state authorities & their overlords is fact that citizens of Iraq give support to ISIS(they perceive ISIS as more suitable ruling power rather than officials founded by America& Co) which would not be the case when Hussein would be in power. I believe Hussein with his loyal forces would not allow for ISIS to roam freely in his country.
Of course we could argue what would be better - Hussein still in power or American & Co invaders. In my opinion a stable (to some extent as Hussein was involved in brutal civil opressions against opposing islamic group) country is a better way to go rather than annihiliation of all government structures & their replacement under 'freedom' banner.
But we are talking here about ISIS and their main interest are christians, I found these on web, not much convincing for me but always something :