Jump to content
Server time: 2019-04-22, 17:00

RandyRP

GAMEMASTER
Anarchy
Someone Born in Blood
  • Content Count

    771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Country

    United States

RandyRP last won the day on February 8

RandyRP had the most liked content!

TIME PLAYED

320 h Bean Bandit

Community Reputation

364 Regular

Account information

  • Whitelisted YES
  • Last played 1 day ago

About RandyRP

  • Birthday January 26

Personal Information

  • Sex
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

  • Dusty

  • NozzyRP

  • GrizzlyOG

  • Osku

  • Tander

  1. RandyRP

    RandyRP

    You're like that cigarette
    That shot of 100 proof
    No matter how much I get
    I'm always craving
    That feeling when we kiss
    The way your body moves
    No matter how much I get
    I'm always craving you
    Craving you

  2. RandyRP

    The House

    //Unarchived upon request. Welcome back
  3. RandyRP

    RandyRP

    Finally home from WV

    1. Xehara

      Xehara

      Welcome home. You were missed. 

  4. RandyRP

    S1 KOS AOGM baiting 2019-04-10, 20:16

    Verdict: @CharlieD - Attempted Invalid Kill | Guilty @Okhchen Satori - Invalid Kill (KOS) | AOGM | Guilty @Matt Chillas - Baiting | Guilty @Pooks098 - Invalid Kill (Firefight) | Inconclusive @ZanderGris0207 - Temp Banned (Still no POV) | Will have to create an appeal Explanation: To shortly summarize the situation. @Eagle, @DK_Major, & their allies are at prison island roleplaying inside the compound. When @Matt Chillas shows up at the front gate. They start to exchange some words towards one another. When @Matt Chillas starts to throw insult after insult at the people inside the compound. They ask him to leave a few times nicely, but he keeps at it until a few of them initiate on them. He then decides to walk away. When @DK_Major get shot from a distance. They then kill the person who shot and the person that was infront of the gates. They continue their RP when they hear more shots and @Eagle is killed by @Okhchen Satori. Another fight takes place where each side loose players, with the fight slowly ending due to loses. Moving onto the rulebreaks that are in question: Attempted Invalid Kill: In the beginning of the situation where @Matt Chillas was initiated on by only certain people who were inside the compound. With them being in a dynamic group they would not share Kill Rights with that initiation. Since @CharlieD was in a dynamic with @Matt Chillas they would only share Defense Rights, on the people who initiated. @DK_Majorwas one of the people who did not initiate, so @CharlieD or any of his allies in his dynamic would not have Defense Rights on him. Since there were no rights @CharlieD will be found guilty of Attempted Invalid Kill. Baiting: The situation all started in the beginning of the video where @Matt Chillas can been seen coming up to the gate of the prison compound. Here you can see that there were multiple insults thrown at the people inside the compound. They even asked him to leave nicely multiple times, but he stayed there insulting them and flipping them off, along with constantly telling them what are they going to do or do something about it. He was baiting for Kill Rights because as soon as he was told to leave or he will be killed @DK_Major was shot by one of @Matt Chillas allies thinking they had rights on everyone inside the compound. With that being said @Matt Chillas will be found guilty of Baiting. Invalid Kill (KOS) | AOGM: After the first situation in the beginning, things die down. Then @Okhchen Satori logs in inside the compound to be behind them. @Okhchen Satori did not have Defense Rights on the people inside the compound because he was not logged on when the first situation originally happened nor did he roleplay with them prior to give him rights since he was logged out. @Okhchen Satori used the logging in & out system to his advantage by logging in behind them inside the compound to get an advantage, this is considered Abuse of Game Mechanics and will be found guilty as such. Since there was no Defense Rights shared between @Okhchen Satori and his allies because he wasn't logged in he will be found guilty of Invalid Kill (KOS) because there was no roleplay that took place before the kill and the original fight was already over. Invalid Kill (Firefight): The other kills that happened during the firefight can not be deemed valid or invalid. Since we have no proof showing that either party initiated on the other granting Kill Rights. Therefore these will be found as Inconclusive. The Rules that support this verdict: 2.2 Exploiting or abuse of game mechanics (AOGM) is gaining an unfair advantage by using game bugs or mechanics in a way that the developer did not intend them to work. Example of exploiting is loot cycling, placing objects inside walls or other places where the object would normally not fit in, driving vehicles underwater, creating impenetrable tent walls, or intentionally using indestructible objects as shields that effectively give you invulnerability. 4.2 When your life is at risk or you are subjected to a hostile action by other players you are allowed to defend yourself. This is granted by two different "kill rights" that you can gain based on circumstances of the situation like which side caused the hostile situation and which side you are on. If you are a defender - the one being initiated on or subjected to other hostile actions that threaten your life which you did not start or provoke - you are allowed to defend yourself by gaining DEFENDER RIGHTS on the attackers. Defender rights allow you to kill attackers for 2 hours or until your character dies. Defender rights can be shared with anyone who you recently role played with as well as all your group members, if you are a part of an approved group. If you are an attacker - the one who first did the initiation or started, caused or provoked the hostile situation - you are allowed to defend yourself by gaining ATTACKER RIGHTS on the defenders. Attacker rights allow you to kill defenders for 1 hour or until your character dies. Attacker rights can be only be shared with your approved group members. If you are not a part of an approved group, attacker rights can not be shared and apply only for your character. 4.7 You may not bait other players into situations where you provoke the player into using hostile actions and then using kill rights to kill them. This is known as baiting. Before I close out I would like to make a few suggestions. When it comes to Kill Rights and how they are granted. If you are not in an approved group and you are playing with a dynamic then you can only share Defense Rights if you have recently roleplayed with one another. If you are not sure if you have rights it is always best to reinitiate just to be safe, you can't just kill someone on sight with no roleplay either if you have no rights. When it comes to being hostile and throwing insults back and forth, make sure that it isn't baiting by making sure that there are still other paths that the other party can take with the roleplay besides just initiating. When you constantly refuse to leave and are still being hostile with insults that is leaving them with no choice but to initiate on you to get you to leave. Outcome: @CharlieD - Attempted Invalid Kill | Guilty - 2 Day Ban & 5 Warning Points @Okhchen Satori - Invalid Kill (KOS) | AOGM | Guilty - 7 Day Ban & 10 Warning Points | Whitelist Revoked @Matt Chillas - Baiting | Guilty - 5 Day Ban & 10 Warning Points @Pooks098 - Invalid Kill (Firefight) | Inconclusive - No Action Taken @ZanderGris0207 - Temp Banned (Still no POV) | Will have to create an appeal Signed by: @Pontiff, @lukaszxe, @Banshee, @Samti & @RandyRP w/ Notes
  5. RandyRP

    RandyRP

    Starting this 5hr drive to WV

    1. Major

      Major

      oof

  6. Country fried, baptized in gravy
    I can't wash off what the good Lord made ya
    No matter how far that highway goes
    An old dirt road'll get you home (c'mon!)
    If you see it in their eye when they try to lie
    If you the bullet-hole-in-a-stop-sign kind
    Then I'm right there wit'cha, put your drinks up high
    For my country folk (hey) my country folk (hey)

    @Clarence

  • RandyRP

    Alpha Company 3-34 [Always Recruiting]

    //Archived upon request PM a Mod+ to bring the group back.
  • RandyRP

    Alpha Company 3-34

    @J1988Dizzle You would like the group Archived correct?
  • RandyRP

    RandyRP

    Picked up some more ammo for my AR15

    3823D4A7-D90C-46C3-8629-91D0649CDBB3.thumb.jpeg.b53017972c7f4cbed53262025c4ad76d.jpeg

  • RandyRP

    S1 Tisy Summer Camp: Killing of Compliant Hostage 3:57

    @Zorull Thank you for posting you POV. Your Temp Ban has been lifted. Please keep an eye on this report in case we require anymore information. Also, @Zorull Can you please provide us with the Full Unedited Video. This video you can see has been clipped because of the transition in the middle and at the end.
  • RandyRP

    The Chernarus Space Program Wasn't For Me

    That was truly funny, imagine being inside of it when that happened. Oof
  • RandyRP

    S1 NW Air field kos 2019 04 11 1:54-2:05

    Verdict: @BobbySullivan - Invalid Kill - KOS | Inconclusive Explanation: To shortly summarize the situation. @Jake Sanders is at NWAF with his allies in the surrounding area. When @BobbySullivan and his allies show up, they gather at the building @Jake Sanders is in and then head to the room. While they are on the roof some words are exchanged, along with the proposition of a possible trade. He is then killed by @BobbySullivan while on the roof. Moving onto the Invalid Kill on @Jake Sanders. With there possibly being a situation prior to this one where @BobbySullivan would have gained Defense Rights from @Jake Sanders when they attempted to rob @Zombru for his backpack. We can not be 100% sure if rights were gained or not. The screenshots provided show someone matching exactly how @Jake Sanderslooked during the situation at NWAF. Therefor we have decided to mark this report as Inconclusive. The rule that supports this verdict: 4.2 When your life is at risk or you are subjected to a hostile action by other players you are allowed to defend yourself. This is granted by two different "kill rights" that you can gain based on circumstances of the situation like which side caused the hostile situation and which side you are on. If you are a defender - the one being initiated on or subjected to other hostile actions that threaten your life which you did not start or provoke - you are allowed to defend yourself by gaining DEFENDER RIGHTS on the attackers. Defender rights allow you to kill attackers for 2 hours or until your character dies. Defender rights can be shared with anyone who you recently role played with as well as all your group members, if you are a part of an approved group. If you are an attacker - the one who first did the initiation or started, caused or provoked the hostile situation - you are allowed to defend yourself by gaining ATTACKER RIGHTS on the defenders. Attacker rights allow you to kill defenders for 1 hour or until your character dies. Attacker rights can be only be shared with your approved group members. If you are not a part of an approved group, attacker rights can not be shared and apply only for your character. Before I close out I would like to make a few suggestions. When it come to Kill Rights you need to make sure that it makes IC sense to use them. You also need to make sure that your Kill Rights are valid, if you feel that they might not be or aren't sure it is always best to reinitiate just to be safe. This will make sure everything is covered and that no one is killed without reason. Outcome: @BobbySullivan - Invalid Kill - KOS | Inconclusive - No Action Taken Signed by: @lukaszxe & @RandyRP w/ Notes
  • RandyRP

    BadRP in Novaya Petrovka -S1 -around 00:00

    A group of the Staff Team have reviewed this report. We have decided to honor the OPs request and close this report seeing that both parties have agreed on closing this report. With that being said if this report continued @Robert Faltin you would have been found guilty of Metagaming. You would have been found guilty because you were relaying information to your allies over the radio while your hands were up. I would like to state that if your hands are up or you are restrained than you may not communicate over the radio, this can provide an unfair advantage for your allies. Now @Shroud and his allies would not have been found guilty of BadRP. Throughout the entire situation they were providing RP to everyone who was involved. //Closed Signed by: @lukaszxe & @RandyRP
  • RandyRP

    S1 Prison Island - Unnecessary Racism / BadRP

    @BigDaddy Will be Temp Banned until they provide the Full Unedited Video for this situation.
  • RandyRP

    S1 Vybor Police Station RDM

    @cpilbeam Will be Temp Banned until they provide the Full Unedited Video for this report.
  • ×
    ×
    • Create New...