Jump to content
Server time (UTC): 2019-09-18, 06:26

Daze

Bronze
  • Content Count

    104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Newcomer

Account information

  • Whitelisted NO
  1. Was that really needed? This is a funny thread about the IRA clan, not the actual IRA. Go take your sectarian arguments elsewhere. My sectarian arguments? All I did was post videos? Lmao.
  2. It's all a bit pointless really.
  3. In-land North does need a hospital. It takes the piss getting infecting in say Lopatino and knowing you have to head to Cherno or Berezino coughing and spluttering to get antibiotics. Not sure about the barracks though - NWAF is pretty close and there are two there, Guglovo is also two towns west and there's one there. If there was to be another barracks put anywhere I'd say Zelenegorsk would be a good area to have it.
  4. But how can there be any confusion when someone is shouting "You have 10 seconds to drop your weapons. 10, 9, 8..."? I think it's tedious and just stating the obvious having to say "or I'll kill you". What other outcome could the victim be expecting? "Drop your weapons or I'll have to give you my spare can of coke"? They can kill you for saying "drop your weapon" but I can't kill them for not complying - doesn't make sense. Honestly, the fact that not stating the "or I'll have to kill you" bit is a ban-able offence is something that needs changed, in my opinion.
  5. If we can all agree that initiating a robbery is a hostile action, why am I not allowed to kill someone for not complying just because I didn't state the very obvious and say "I will kill you if you don't". What else am I going to do if he doesn't comply, bloodbag him? They can kill me for saying it; but I can't kill them after saying it and them not complying. Doesn't make much sense to me. So they can kill me for saying it (but it has no intent because I didn't say I would kill them if they didn't comply), but I can't kill them for not complying. Honestly has anyone ever thought about how ridiculous that rule is? I have to tell someone I am robbing that if they happen to not drop their weapon I will kill them? Talk about stating the obvious. Again, is there a rule against using common sense? Kind of a grey area, I agree. Wouldn't hurt to revise this rule. Yeah man I agree. I don't think this particular rule is very well worded or thought out.
  6. You told them to drop their weapons, that's a hostile action. They can kill you So they can kill me for saying it (but it has no intent because I didn't say I would kill them if they didn't comply), but I can't kill them for not complying. Honestly has anyone ever thought about how ridiculous that rule is? I have to tell someone I am robbing that if they happen to not drop their weapon I will kill them? Talk about stating the obvious. Again, is there a rule against using common sense?
  7. So if I run up to someone and say "drop your weapon" and they don't comply then kill me, I can report them for RDM and they will receive a ban?
  8. Looking for this cleared up - if you are robbing someone and you say "drop your weapons", they can shoot you because attempting a robbery is a hostile action, but if they don't drop their weapons you can't shoot them because you never said "drop your weapons or I'll kill you"? If that's the case, who writes these rules? In a real life situation if someone with a gun says "give me your wallet" do you just not give it to him because he didn't say "or I'll kill you". Is there a rule somewhere that says "do not apply common sense to any situation"? I honestly think that rule needs changed.
×
×
  • Create New...