Jump to content
Server time: 2018-12-17, 15:52

OskuRP

GAMEMASTER

"His name that sat on him was death, and hell followed with him."

  • Content Count

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OskuRP

  1. OskuRP

    "Not active character"

    You need to set your IG name as the name of your active character from the DayZ launcher.
  2. OskuRP

    1.0 Countdown

    Thats the most I've ever gotten anyway so I should be fine
  3. OskuRP

    OskuRP

    I highly recommend trying this update/mode for anyone who owns Rising Storm 2! So fucking fun to play and a nice change of pace to the otherwise extremely gory, realistic wargame with a harrowing almost PTSD inducing soundscape.

  4. OskuRP

    Should drugs give you extra HP?

    I voted yes, because I like the idea of this creating high demand for the drugs even though realistically it doesnt make that much sense. Also it would be nice if the effects would wear off so you would have to take them all the time to keep the buff up.
  5. OskuRP

    Teamspeak 3 Memorial Thread

    Or that time me and @groovy tonyRP put a lot of effort into convincing @A Reformed BorisRP that he was going to get permed
  6. OskuRP

    Teamspeak 3 Memorial Thread

    Good times were had there...
  7. OskuRP

    OskuRP

    6c155f604553447aa16cbdac108c7e12.png
    Sad day...

    1. Falk

      Falk

      😞 

    2. A Reformed BorisRP

      A Reformed BorisRP

      Hm

      Metagaming is gonna be real hard to prove now

       

    3. OskuRP

      OskuRP

      And even worse, its gonna be real hard to do 😉

    4. Gowbe

      Gowbe

      Seems like the server took the sad news badly..

       0dc8b478772ffe33693d78b585c44ee2.png
       

  8. OskuRP

    • OskuRP
    •   
    • JoffreyRP

    Johnny Depp GIF

  9. OskuRP

    The lights are out

    *Oskar looks through Harrison's belongings at the castle, searching for information on a contact known as "Andy". After looking through the pockets of Harrison's teared up shirt he finds a small slip of paper dotted with a few drops of blood. He tunes his radio to the frequency written on the paper, and presses down the PTT.* "Andy, the lights are out at the house. Could you send someone to turn them back on?" *Oskar releases the PTT, puts out his cigarette on the bottom of his shoe and crumbles the piece of paper into his pocket*
  10. OskuRP

    Require recording during hostile situations

    As someone who is a part of a hostile group and plays on a laptop that probably isnt even techically capable of recording, I strongly disagree with this idea. As mentioned it is the responsibility of the accusor to prove that a rule is broken. Innocent until proven guilty and all that. If one person from the initiating group needs to be recording and it doesnt need to be the one dropping the initiation the video evidence could just be someone sitting in a double-red looking at a wall and the video would be useless. The main thing in my opinion is that this rule would just get too complicated and hard to enforce and it would damage the quality of RP when people have to be thinking about who is recording and initiating at all times. Sure, it would make reports easier to deal with but I dont want to get into an immersion breaking situation where I need to call someone else from the group over to drop an initiation on someone who insults me etc. just because I have to have someone capable of recording do it. If this rule would be implemented initiations couldnt happen organically anymore.
  11. OskuRP

    VDM Rulebreak Punishment Suggestion

    I think this would be a good addition to the rules considering the rather harsh punishment RedRP received from what seemed to be an actual accident. I think the wording could be different though because in my opinion you should be able to kill someone with a vehicle if you have rights and the opportunity but the suggested wording wouldn't technically allow for that.
  12. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    In my humble opinion it would be time to change the CL rule to represent more closely how it is/should be enforced. At the moment the rule goes like this: 4.6 Combat logging is leaving the server during or shortly after a hostile situation or when your character is still involved in active role play. After a hostile action has occurred where you were involved, you may only log out from the game after a minimum of 30 minutes have passed since you broke the line of sight with others involved in that situation. This rule can be ignored if the other players give you OK to log out earlier. The way it is written would suggest that any people who have been a part of a hostile situation (including hostages or even people who were involved in a mass initiation but were let go by the initiators) should wait their 30 minutes before logging even if they haven't done anything hostile whatsoever. This is not how the rule has been enforced ever to my knowledge until this recent report. The people who wrote the verdict did it correctly and followed the rule to the letter. That being said I think the rule doesn't make sense and should be changed. I don't know anyone in this community who would put a timer after being released as a hostage and wait for 30 minutes before logging nor do I know of anyone before Rebel who has been punished for not doing this. This suggestion is not about the report though since it is a bit more complicated situation with the whole inside man angle to it but the verdict was what made me look up the exact wording of the CL rule. I would propose the rule to be changed to something like this: 4.6 Combat logging is leaving the server during or shortly after committing a hostile action against another player or when your character is still involved in active role play. After you have committed a hostile action, you may only log out from the game after a minimum of 30 minutes have passed since you broke the line of sight with others involved in that situation. This rule can be ignored if the other players give you OK to log out earlier. In my opinion it makes no sense for members to be forced to wait 30 minutes after being taken hostage or robbed. The whole purpose of the rule is to give the people you committed a hostile action against a chance to hunt you down or retaliate in some way. If you are about to log off and get robbed with you having no intention to take revenge on the people who robbed you it doesn't make sense for you to have to wait such a long time before being allowed to hop off. I wrote to our glorious dictator leader Rolle about this a few days ago and he was open to the idea but he needs some convincing so please vote in the poll and give your opinion below.
  13. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    So you are suggesting that everyone logs out an hour before they need to go just incase they get robbed + have to wait their timer? That just doesnt make any sense to me! You also seem to forget that the whole point of the rule is to stop people from doing something hostile and then leaving the server so that the victims of their actions dont have a chance to retaliate. What is the logic behind you having to wait for your "combat log" timer if you were a complying hostage and you have no intention of getting revenge.
  14. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    Sure it might be justified but is it necessary? The rule has never been enforced this way and isnt the whole point of it to allow people who might want to take revenge on you the time to track you down? As a complying hostage this isnt needed since no one is coming to get you. I was about the ask the same but as someone who doesnt speak english as a first language I wasnt a 100% sure I was correct so I thought I wouldnt risk embarassing myself
  15. OskuRP

    Love

  16. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    This is how the rule has always been interpreted and enforced but the wording in the rule would suggest that hostages do indeed need to wait their 30. Now that a comment in an appeal verdict said what was screenshotted above the staff team would have to (in the name of consistency) start punishing people for this unless the wording of the rule is changed. As I said in the original post I dont want to make this thread about the report and the appeal verdict and im not even saying that they were wrong since that situation was a bit more complex than just a complying hostage logging before 30 minutes. I was just joking about that part to make a point about nitpicking but in the hypothetical situation you could just be wondering around a trading camp and stumble upon someone stealing from the tents. Technically you would have to wait your 30 since stealing is considered a hostile action and as a witness you were a part of it.
  17. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    The rule is not ambiguous at all in my opinion. It clearly states that people who are involved in a hostile situation need to wait 30 minutes before logging out and this includes complying hostages. This hasnt ever been enforced and if we were to continue not punishing for this I think the rule should be changed to reflect how the it is actually interpreted.
  18. OskuRP

    Christmas Gifts in Item shop

    Orem shop? Whats that?
  19. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    Also where do we draw the line? If we would truly follow the rule to the letter people who witnessed someone rob something from a tent should wait for 30 minutes before logging since technically "a hostile action has occurred where they were involved". Now that^ would be nitpicking @Click
  20. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    No, it's just me pointing out something in the rules that doesn't make sense in my opinion. If you feel that complying hostages should have to wait 30 minutes to log off you are more than welcome to argue your point.
  21. OskuRP

    Proposed change to the wording of rule 4.6 (CL)

    To be honest I havent looked into the report and the appeal that deeply but the image I got from the appeal verdict was that it was exactly this sort of situation he was punished for But it has never been enforced like that! If the wording isn't changed we will have to start enforcing it like that from now on. Or are you suggesting we don't change the wording and continue turning a blind eye to it?
  22. OskuRP

    Top 5 DayZRP PVPers

    People who have tagged themselves in their own lists
  23. OskuRP

    Create Your Staff Team

  24. OskuRP

    • OskuRP
    •   
    • KyleRP

    big house kyle GIF by South Park

  25. OskuRP

    The House

    I think we will need a bigger house
×