I'd love to, but we should probably get back on topic, which was to limit the time on when you can submit the evidence.
And like I said in my last post, which was probably missed, the idea is good and I like it, however most of the evidence we get has no date visible on it, so the rule would be unpractical. And in the case of really bad stuff someone has done we would ignore the rule anyway, so I'm not sure if it's really needed in the end? I mean obviously if someone sends us a screenshot of a one liner someone posted a year ago then we may or may not disregard it anyway. It's all judged on case to case basis by the admin team whether or not something is of abusive nature or not.
Rolle, I can recall abusive things you said while in the Banter skype, some of which involved you using some derogatory and racist words towards the kids there, this was well over a year ago, if you were not owner, would i be able to use this against you a year later if you got on my bad side?
Cause thats the type of behaviour you are promoting.
Ad no threat intended. <3
Not sure why this hasn't been addressed yet. There were around 15-20 people in that skype. Doesn't seem like you cared too much about not being offensive then. Tired of this staff mentality that we're the ones who are fucked up and your shit doesn't smell. It's total BS. We've seen how staff talk about people so how are you going to pretend what Cory did was so appalling? Especially when the person who took the screenshot only used it when it suited their interests. This needs to end.