Jump to content
Server time: 2018-02-22, 19:02


  1. LouieRP
  2. WesternRP
  3. Hebee
  4. Nihoolious

Popular Content

Showing most liked content on 02/25/17 in all areas

  1. 14 likes
    1) The Saviors wanted Black Skull out for being disruptive in the settlement. If we were looking for a fight wouldn't of they used said rights? 2) Setting up a trade embargo is baiting and also a hostile action towards the settlement. If they wanted to attack us so badly why not wait outside like stated previously to capture someone. why not make an attempt to capture @Steck and provide us with hostage RP? 3) Since they were not a faction at the time so when @ThatRyanGuy punched me within the settlement limits does this break this rule here? We were preparing for conflict ever since we barred Black Skull we knew they would find some excuse to attack us regardless. The Trade Embargo was clearly set up for us to commit the first hostile act so they can use kill rights on us. We even discussed should we initiate on them should we give them the fight in which they desire. We were debating our options throughout the whole situation which ended up in a firefight regardless.
  2. 5 likes
  3. 4 likes
    Honestly, It was a Terrible Initiation. I watched that video and it seemed like the players were all new and were scared to initiate. I think it was close to 5v3 wasn't it? So if they had them outnumbered, why have one man initiate and then hide while everyone else was barely within text range (as you can see that the man initiated on and the man recording were about 10-15 feet away and the text initiation could not be seen.) But the Group and the terrible initiation wasn't even the worst part of that report. The worst part is when the surviving member of the group that was initiated on begin to roleplay the situation out with a man he met, who starts to roleplay back, until he thinks he has KOS on the man. The survivor was then Sprayed down and all roleplay was disregarded. so all in all in that report, we had a poorly planned and conceived initiation followed by kills that were to the detriment of roleplay. And by that I mean born from Ruleplay. Honestly I would expect more from people who are not new to the community. Edit: Just read that Verdict. I don't agree with it.
  4. 3 likes
    To give a direct answer, they willingly did not let myself leave. Kuljukka chopped the tape down, and I left the compound, was followed with people shuffling around me as heard in the video acting suspicious, to go grab some flat beer from the Pagan compound. It seemed as if once I left the settlement, they were considering of whether to shoot or not, as we were waiting for the inevitable. The enforcement from my opinion wasn't as strong towards the Pagan's, it was more of so towards @lukzo2024 and the two Savior members. Once I got back in the settlement, I got an empty beer can thrown at me.
  5. 3 likes
    Logged onto my facebook to see all my most private of dick pics posted all over my wall. My eBay was hacked and I'm currently disputing over $3000 in purchases of 'irregular christmas lights' and a bulk purchase of 200 display Nike freeruns (only left footed). Thanks Rolle.
  6. 3 likes
  7. 3 likes
    So 2 hour long firefight. MVP for New Moon, Pagans and Saviours was probably @ExoticRainbow for most kills MVP for Black Skull and Akrasia were the Pagans and Puncture with the team kills. And whoever says you killed "4, 5, 7 etc." put your money where your mouth is before making bold claims. I killed a rando and got reported and shared a kill with Rocka at the end. Was fun meet tomorrow same time k?
  8. 3 likes
    *Jimmy struggling to hear a broadcast moves his radio closer to his ear, still in frustration be cannot hear the man that well. He sees Miller to his right lifts his radio up and listens to him transmit and decides to respond himself* Listen here buddy you gotta speak up when you broadcast I doubt it's my radio but I couldn't hear shit you said. However based on Miller's response I'd just like to reiterate the fact that he is our leader and he ain't going nowhere. We answer to him no matter how questionable it may be. And if you have a problem with that then go pound salt. *Jimmy lowers his radio and puts it back in his bag muttering to Miller* What the hell did that guy even say? I couldn't hear a damn word.
  9. 2 likes
    *Gunnar grabs his radio, pushing down the PTT, as he looks at the radio. "Funny, Vice President.. Haha. Ha. H-Ha?" Silence fills the channel for some seconds before he speaks up again, the Swedish Pagan speaking up, a shakey voice. Almost like a scared child. "V-VP, do not fuck with me! I will kill you if you shot yourself!" .... "Pagansdon'tcrypagansdon'tcry.." He repeats, things clearly getting tough for Gunnar.
  10. 2 likes
    Similar scenario in which the initiation "reach for the sky / touch the sky" was the initiation, whilst the person initiating was pointing a weapon at the party reporting. @Rocco got banned for this as it was deemed an invalid initiation even though he made demands and was pointing a weapon at the target, the consequence. I have no understanding how this initiation from the report being discussed at hand was considered valid personally.
  11. 2 likes
    I personally thought that everyone who didn't shoot or kill Ramsay in that report would've gotten fucked for RDM. The initiation that was heard in the video was "Put them up, dickhead". That's an initiation on one person, and it was clear that it was on Ramsay. Apparently text initiations were dropped from the sniper house, but that clearly wasn't seen in the video. As much as I don't want my friends (the accused in that report) to be banned, some of them probably should've been hit with RDM. Just another mistake in a growing list of mistakes being made. If the initiation was "Everybody put your hands up", then it would've been fine. It used to be said that if you hear an initiation, you should act as if it's on you if it's not absolutely clear who it's on. But in this case, I still don't think "Put them up, dickhead" is clear enough for everybody to put their hands up. Also, I find it interesting how even with the addition of former staff members back into staff, it seems the same mistakes are being made as before. Even crazier is the fact that the people that were bitching about mistakes being made before are now completely silent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  12. 2 likes
    Verdict: @Dustin RDM/Ruleplay: Not Guilty @Poro RDM: Not Guilty @Mexi RDM: Not Guilty @Kunkka Ghosting: Not Guilty @Sarilla Ghosting: Not Guilty @Ramsay888 Metagaming: Guilty Explanation: After reviewing this report, several members of the GM team have come to the following conclusion: In relation to @Poro and @Mexi, after reviewing the video we cannot judge this to be RDM. An initiation was dropped and a sufficient amount of time was given to comply. As seen in the video at 4:57 the initiation is dropped and accused holds fire until 5:08 a total of 11 seconds later. During those seconds the OP's group proceeds to jog away and even acknowledge the initiation. During that time they had more than enough time to comply rendering us to give this a not guilty verdict. However, we do note that certain improvements could have been made to the situation. For example instead of saying "put em up" you could have specified "put your hands up and guns on the ground". Furthermore you could have repeated yourself more than once to make sure that your targets understood you. As for the kill by @Dustinwe also fail to see how this is RDM. The OP approaches Dustin at 6:21. Given the video evidence on both sides we see Dustin was involved in this firefight and simply lied to get an advantage over the situation. Lying in game is not against the rules. He was a part of the situation and as such had KOS rights. We fail to see the ruleplay in this as everything he did was within his rights and by our rules legitimate. @Sarilla and @Kunkka as we can see in the logs it looks like you both legitimately had problems with your connection to the server, however you both switched to S2 for some reason or another and then back to S1. Normally this could be classed as ghosting depending on how the situation went down. However from all the evidence provided we see that you were both back in the server or in the process of logging in at time the initiation dropped. From the videos it was clear that most of you had no idea the initiation was about to occur and thus had no reason to switch in an attempt to get an advantage. In addition Kunkka did not open fire until he was initiated on by Lyaria upon logging back into the server. Also Sarilla just complied once reentering the server and regaining a steady connection. @Ramsay888 at 5:11 you die and proceed to say so. While this is technically meta gaming its far from punishable as just stating your dead is a knee jerk reaction. Our problem resides within the next few seconds in which you proceed to tell everyone exactly what happened, how you died and your killers location. This is unacceptable and by all accounts metagaming. Next time you die in game, if you cannot help but talk and tell people information regarding the situation simply mute or leave the channel to avoid breaking this rule yet again. With the above stated the following will apply: Outcome: @Dustin RDM/Ruleplay: Not Guilty - No action taken @Poro RDM: Not Guilty - No action taken @Mexi RDM: Not Guilty - No action taken @Sarilla Ghosting: Not Guilty - No action taken @Kunkka Ghosting: Not Guilty - No action taken @Ramsay888 Metagaming: Guilty - 3 day ban + banstrike
  13. 2 likes
    I apologize for the terrible shooting. For some reason my gun kept firing when I tried to burst fire on top of my shitty aiming skills. As you can see from the heap of bodies outside, the gunfire and the comms it was a large and hectic firefight with hostiles everywhere. I wasn't going to take any chances when I see a guy in my building pull a gun out in a warzone. I apologize for the inconvenience but hopefully this paints a better picture.
  14. 2 likes
  15. 2 likes
    I've made a sandwich & Cleaned my basement and painted my house! I'm in *Position 15*
  16. 2 likes
    *Static comes across the channel in a small burst before clearing up to the distinct sound of crunching gravel underfoot, perhaps the sort found on train tracks. The voice is familiar, but John is quiet and soft spoken.* "Just letting everyone know I'm here, and fine... But I won't be coming back to camp, not anytime soon." He clears his throat, and a woman's voice can be heard indistinctly in the background. "Probably not good for my health to be somewhere when it's just a matter of time I'm considered expendable or not worth it anymore by the man everyone follows. That I followed... That I believed in. That she... believed in..." *He sighed.* "I'm not here to cause waves. And I don't want your self-righteous indignation in response, Axel. Just remember, she's dead because you decided the only people worthy of your help were the ones clinging to your arm." *The line squeals with feedback for a moment then grows silent.*
  17. 2 likes
  18. 1 like
    Saturday party? Playing 70s - 80s https://plug.dj/dayzrp-com
  19. 1 like
    Saturday party? Playing some 70s-80s music.
  20. 1 like
    Fantastic RP today. Enjoy my time at the 101, thanks for being so welcoming and showing us around. Shoutout to Sam, Josh and the cowboy dude very much enjoyed the rp along with our trek and supply run hope to see you guys again & can't wait for more rp to continue later on today
  21. 1 like
    I don't think "put them up, <whatever>" is a valid initiation as it does not meet the requirements specified in the rules stating that all hostile demands/actions must be made clear and unambiguous to all players.
  22. 1 like
    Today, on my way back home at the train station #SaturdaySelfi
  23. 1 like
    Link to the situation: Any supporting evidence or notes: N/A Feedback: I'm not entirely sure if this post right here is the result of a group staff decision and you just decided to post it, or if it is simply you posting it because it is your understanding of the baiting rule, but it left me and I feel like it has also left others confused on the actual meaning of what baiting is. Rule for reference: Perhaps this is just a matter of the wording of the rule being changed, but before the new ruleset baiting was about being forced into situations in where using or trying to obtain kill rights was the only other option. Though that may not be explicitly clear here in the new wording of the rule regarding baiting I'm sure that still holds quite a bit of merit, so this is what I am basing it upon. Despite there being a trade blockade set up by the opposing party in the report, I see no reason that the owners of the settlement HAVE to try and obtain or use kill rights in order to find a solution to the trade blockade. The owners still have the choice to either try and attack the blockade to thwart their plans or they can just leave it alone and not get any trade from that direction. At no point were the settlement owners forced to use kill rights. Baiting is like being stuck in a house and there are players outside blocking the door so that you can't get out, so the only options you have are to either log out and give up or attempt to initiate and kill those blocking the house so you can get out. That makes it so that the only real option use kill rights once/if they are gained. Blocking off trade to a settlement simply seems like good RP, seeing as those who own the settlement can try and talk it out with those blocking their trade and if that doesn't work, take them out by force or simply just don't do anything about it. Is it a hindrance? Yes, but that is the point of a blockade, is it not? If anything, I would commend them setting up a blockade to try and further RP. It seems clear in the report that the opposing party was able to approach to blockade for some RP, so it wasn't like their were initiating on anything that got close. Their purpose was to hinder the settlement without straight up attacking it, and if you had an enemy in-game and you knew that they were conducting trade, I would think that you would also agree that trying to hinder their supplies and supply routes would be a good way to further RP between the groups. Suggestions for improvement: One of a few things could be improved on this. Either the baiting rule needs more clarifications on the changes it actually took when the ruleset changed or simply this was a mistake in the understanding of the baiting rule by either myself and other members of the community or yourself and the staff team. If this is a matter of the rules being unclear in this situation they should be updated appropriately so the community is not confused on what is good hostile RP or what is considered baiting. The only other thing I can think of in terms of my own mistake in understanding the situation or a mistake from the staff team would be if because that they are a settlement that they are literally untouchable, and I don't believe that to be a case just because the opposing group was not a faction at the time.
  24. 1 like
  25. 1 like
    Honestly, if you have over 500 hours in DayZ you can tell if it is a login animation or not. By the fact that he is just looking straight forward and not moving while pulling out his weapon. Anyways, if you listen to the video about the end you're saying that "he just relogged." Which means that he logged out, and then just "logged in".( In this case I just logged in havent played for a week or so.) So that means you were already aware of the fact that I "JUST" logged in. And as I can tell out of your total posts, and rep in the forums you're a player that knows the rules.. So my question is, why would you even consider shooting someone who just logged in? So I dont really know if you're just trying to save your own ass or not.
  26. 1 like
    @Elmo Pretty much this. Every time is much fun and it was great. This night was really difficult for me to pull actually. I hope it came across the desperation and the struggle she is going through. It was hard actually and I felt really really exhausted. @Boston Was great man even though you mad everything worse for her/me. @Lord Dynamitae Great and awesome like always. @Jade Always fun with you my favorite Kiwi. Everyone we met of course. RP is not dead. Thanks for showing that!
  27. 1 like
    The map editor is pretty boring really, it's mainly just placed and synced modules. Its also messy, like my mind. I know where everything is though...
  28. 1 like
  29. 1 like
    Putting myself in that situation (it doesn't help that the video was in fact made private now) I would have taken that as clear intent. My argument would be there is not enough ambiguity to make a reasonable person familiar with our rules unsure about the intent. The video clearly showed that the people involved had at least a very significant idea there was an initiation. They might not have been in the appropriate mindset at the time to accept that fact but considering all of the facts in that situation and if I were to substitute myself into it I would either shoot back or comply. Them being unsure doesn't mean the intent wasn't clear, just that for whatever reason they were (only somewhat) confused. Also Dusty, I am sorry to say but it has become painfully clear that you have a personal axe to grind with the staff team that has recently given you several guilty verdicts. As for people who use to criticise that are now silent, did you ever think that they believe that the quality of the verdicts has in fact improved and the level of mistakes has gone down? Or is it all an evil conspiracy? Dusty I find your misuse of staff feedback (#1 & #2), your blatant abuse of the appeals process recently as well as your eagerness to try and crucify the staff team (examples linked) for anything you can find to be quite frankly childish. I don't like dressing down community members like this, but I feel it is entirely justified here. It is my hope that you can take a step back, see my criticism's for what they are and address my concerns productively.
  30. 1 like
  31. 1 like
    Australian's and New Zealanders get it worst with ping. They have learnt to adapt, it takes time but it can be done.
  32. 1 like
    I agree with the change but I'm just wondering, was there any notice? or did i just not see one?
  33. 1 like
    I've noticed a lot of people are just shooting anyone in the general vicinity of fire-fights these days, I don't know how I feel about this.
  34. 1 like
    Enjoyed the RP I got from @Moody20, @Kyle_Jones and @lukzo2024 at the new pagan compound. you lavv ittt.
  35. 1 like
  36. 1 like
    What's going on Welden? You can talk to me. Did you see the new Ghostbusters movie and you were so pissed at it, you had to somehow find a way to redeem its name to glory once more?
  37. 1 like
  38. 1 like
  39. 1 like
    When you solve 2 copy/paste backstory appeals by copy/pasting the verdict
  40. 1 like
  41. 1 like
    Come on man seriously... ' Now in those screen shots it shows I have $15k, that was because it was after I bought a Warrior that was 50k, and you start with 50k so in theory I should have been able to buy any cars in the shop. But I couldnt, even though I could afford them. Then I got 15k in a paycheck and then I could. Don't believe me? You most certainly have logs so check them.' Now I've already said I hate maths but I can work out that $15k isn't enough to buy any car in the garage as they are 20k and 50k respectively. (except the quad, that's 8k) So you wonder why you can't buy something worth 20k and up with 15k? And you are surprised that you can afford it when you have 30k? It's basic maths man. 'I then went onto clear a large amount of the town next to the base, that would take me longer than 10 minutes yes? I had to use the thermal the whole time and then died to a mine. I assume u have kill logs?' Those screen-shots show normal Arma 3 fog... Not the sandstorm. Do you realise that? I thought you had a comprehensive handle on the Arma engine... The weather is set up to mirror real world Afghanistan. Sometimes it's foggy there I guess... (This is an ALiVE function, it has also been discussed before in this thread) ' If you take all criticism as insult then there is nothing I can do for you.' Do you know the meaning of the word belligerent? That and the fact that you came here saying that one function was stupid (sandstorms) and shouldn't be implemented when in actual fact you didn't even know that it was just normal Arma fog you were having trouble with and acted like an ass about it.. Of course I'm going to be annoyed having to waste time with that shit. Now, if it was just a simple 'Hey guys, what's up with all this fog/sandstorm (screenshot), It seems like a bit much...' It would be different. We'd be able to tell you that it was fog and explain it to you, without having to take BS about it... Do you see the difference? ' Also, I understand that the mission isn't finished yet, so why don't you just keep updating the original post in the thread? ' I believe I explained why, no one else has trouble following it, or if they do, they will just ask politely. It's not rocket science. The other fact is that Dax started this thread, so how exactly do you expect me to update the original post when he started it? Please man, you're just arguing things here that are pointless and continually showing that you have made mistakes through your own error and are trying to tell us it's our fault though your own frustration.
  42. 1 like
    Hola. This no DayZRP. This library. Jk. Enjoy your stay and good luck on the whitelist :3
  43. 1 like
    ' Bullshit that they only last 10 minutes, ' //Dust Storm if (isServer) then { sleep (500 + (random 5000)); null = [340,600,false,true,false] execvm "dust_storm\duststorm.sqf"; sleep 600 }; KEY: direction_duststorm - integer, from 0 to 360, direction towards the wind blows expressed in compass degrees duration_duststorm - integer, life time of the duststorm expressed in seconds effect_on_objects - boolean, if is true occasionally a random object near playable units will be thrown in the air wall_of_dust - boolean, if true a wall of dust is created lethal_wall - boolean, if true the wall of dust becomes destructive. Let me break that down for you: Can you divide 600 by 60? That's 10 minutes... It also 'sleeps' for 10 minutes after it has finished, then a further 8 1/2 minutes plus a random number of minutes between 0 and 83 1/2 minutes. It's not bugged, it may only seem longer to you because you don't enjoy it. Exactly the same way as maths class seemed longer for me because I hate maths. You can shout bullshit all you want but the code doesn't lie... ' I have over 3000 hours in all the arma games combined. ' If you want to make this into a battle of how much time we've spent on Arma... You have 517 hours on Arma 3 and you claim to have over 3000 hours on Arma games in general. I have over 3000 hours on Arma 3 alone... - As I said, you need to up your game buddy ' and i cant see more than 50-60m' So it's reduced from 100 m to 50-60 m during the course of this conversation? Seems inconsistent... Last night we were on and destroyed everything we came up against in the middle of a sandstorm... I don't really know what to tell you, haha. ' $50000 dollars but if I tried to buy something that was 35k it would still say I had 0 ' Well, here's where I call you on YOUR bullshit buddy-o, class Civilian { displayName = "$STR_HG_SHOP_CIVILIAN"; vehicles[] = { {"CUP_B_LR_Special_M2_GB_D",20000}, {"CUP_C_LR_Transport_CTK",20000}, {"CUP_B_HMMWV_Crows_M2_USA",20000}, {"CUP_B_HMMWV_Transport_USA",20000}, {"CUP_B_MTVR_USA",20000}, {"CAF_AG_afr_p_Offroad",20000}, {"CUP_I_SUV_Armored_ION",20000}, {"CUP_C_SUV_CIV",20000}, {"CUP_I_SUV_ION",20000}, {"O_Quadbike_01_F",8000} }; spawnPoints[] = { {"$STR_HG_MARKER_1",{"civilian_vehicles_spawn"}} }; }; class Military { displayName = "$STR_HG_SHOP_MILITARY"; vehicles[] = { {"CUP_B_Mastiff_GMG_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_Mastiff_HMG_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_Mastiff_LMG_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_RG31E_M2_USMC",50000}, {"CUP_B_RG31_M2_USMC",50000}, {"CUP_B_Dingo_CZ_Des",50000}, {"CUP_B_HMMWV_M2_GPK_USA",50000}, {"CUP_B_HMMWV_M2_GPK_NATO_T",50000}, {"CUP_B_HMMWV_M2_GPK_ACR",50000}, {"CUP_B_Wolfhound_GMG_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_Wolfhound_HMG_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_Wolfhound_LMG_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_FV432_Bulldog_GB_D_RWS",50000}, {"CUP_B_FV432_Bulldog_GB_D",50000}, {"CUP_B_FV510_GB_D_SLAT",50000}, {"CUP_B_MCV80_GB_D_SLAT",50000} }; spawnPoints[] = { {"$STR_HG_MARKER_2",{"military_vehicles_spawn"}} }; }; Stop me when you find one single item in the vehicle shop that's actually worth 35k... Oh wait, you can't. You can't just make shit up when you've goofed. You'll get called on it. I want REAL feedback, not BS said just to try to save face. ' Also if you have a whole bunch of extra information why don't you add it to the original post instead of it being scattered through 10 pages of unorganized comments ' Again, this has already been explained... The mission is not yet finished, not all functions have been finalised or completely finished. Things are in a constant state of flux at the moment. It would be pointless to write up anything like this as it wouldn't be correct from one update to the next. ' so don't say "You clearly didnt read anything about it".' You clearly didn't. It's my job to develop the mission, not hand-hold every Tom, Dick and Harry though processes that they can easily find out about with minimal time spent reading things here. (Or just asking anyone playing or devving politely) lol, dude, do you even test? ' No shit, that is why I said it was still a fun mission despite my grievances. ' No, you left passive aggressive feedback because you want to come off as 'edgy'. It back-fired on you. No one else has done anything like this, why do you think that is? If you think this is a normal way to communicate with people, especially if you actually like something they are doing, you're going to have trouble in life buddy. So, cheers for bringing this thread down to playground level, I WAS trying to avoid this here but I guess it's inevitable. You're not only wasting my time (time that could be spent devving) but you're wasting your own time too. It's stressful enough trying to please everyone with something like this without people acting like spoilt brats. I'd be far more inclined to take you seriously (or even consider anything you say) if you choose to show a little respect and humility... I mean... Why argue the details of something with the guy who's actually creating it? You're never going to know better.
  44. 1 like
  45. 1 like
    I have to be blunt here; I'm aware and in complete agreement that the current patch and state of the game itself are massive contributing factors of why the recent server population is at an all-time low. However I do believe had the approach of discussing a lore wipe been executed differently, then there could potentially be more players in game on average than there are since the recent announcement of a lore wipe. What I mean by that is I believe the announcement itself should have been withheld until after the admins and loremasters had a solid foundation for new lore and a safe bet on when the reset button would be pushed. Right now because of all the uncertainty, the vast majority of our player-base is hesitant to play the game because there is no definitive answer on how long we have left to play on our current in-game progression. The mentality going around is that "there is no motivation to play the game because it's all for nothing" - While i personally don't agree with that statement and still enjoy RP, I have to empathize with those who feel that way because no one knows when or if it's even going to happen. I commend you for giving the community a choice of options on how we wanted it to happen, however I personally think it would have been best to withhold the announcement altogether until you had all of your ducks in a row regarding when it will happen and what the new lore would be based on.
  46. 1 like
    Just my 2c after reading POVs since I got a notification for this report That is baiting. Because you blockaded their settlement and you commit a hostile action within the settlement (doesn't matter on whom). Perfectly classifies as being hostile or abusive within their settlement area which allows them to use lethal force. Also, about generic concerns in posts on page 2 - not knowing about the settlement IC does not free you from the responsibilities and consequences of following the community and game rules, including settlement rules. Also whoever your character is, however he may act, be badass or hostile, it may never go against the rules. You cannot say that "we were hostile and we didn't take shit from them because our group/my character is just like that", you have to follow the rules regardless of IC and explanations like that just reinforce the image of baiting being the primary reason for your actions.
  47. 1 like
  48. 1 like
  49. 1 like
    Trying to fix a bus wheel and my friend drops the ruined wheel on the ground, it rolls down the hill and kills me
  50. 1 like
    I've been unsure about this for a while and I need to know, can I kill a robber? If someone is robbing me and I have the chance to blow his brains out, can I do it? Of course I can't if i have my weapon on my back and so on, but if I have the opportunity of killing him without breaking 'Value for life' life, can I just shoot him without warning? If so, I regret half of the times I've been robbed since we have been aiming at each other but I've been so unsure so I just complied ..