Jump to content
Server time (UTC): 2020-06-05, 23:03 LORE WIPE SALE
Sign in to follow this  

NVFL/Neglect of Hostage Appeal

Recommended Posts

Link to the source of punishment (report/post):



Why the verdict is not fair:

I had been captured and escorted down to Chernogorsk where I had met up with Wolf pack and they had asked me the same question over and over asking: "What military are you part of?" Which I had answered stating I am not with any Military and never have been, yet they continued to ask the same question over and over until they shot me. Upon getting shot I was bandaged and realized I needed water which I had in my inventory and stated "I'm a bit thirsty" and was about to pull my water bottle out in which they had yelled "NO, Don't give him anything". SO I didn't pull anything out to make sure I wouldn't break NVFL after being told NOT TO drink or be given anything to drink.

 Upon reading and agreeing with what was stated in the original report I had saw the appeal come up,. The appeal seemed to be more situated on the presence of the verdict not mentioning a few select rule-breaks. How ever in the report once the verdict is fully read, you can see they touched on every point stating that there was no BadRP, NVFL, Lying in a Report, Avoiding RP or NVFL  as seen below in attached files. 

After the appeal was excepted I had also realized that JimRP is also part of the legion who are directly involved in the situation, to me this seems a bit biased and to much.

I would also like to bring attention to the fact upon receiving my NVFL ban it was entered as KoS and I had to go chat with JimRP and myself about the subject matter that only seemed to go in a circle before he fixed the issue of the ban. During this conversation I do believe that JimRP may have acted a bit unprofessional  raised his voice while I was calm and not talk over him. JimRP also stated at the beginning of our conversation that he had done the report himself and went over others and made the decisions himself only to go back on that statement a few minutes later saying that he had worked with another GM that had believed the same thing as him, however they din't sign the Appeal with him? This is a bit confusing, if someone believes the same opinion as you and you are going to help push their appeal forward you should sign the appeal as well. Very contraindicating and unprofessional.

Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view: My encounter with JimRP was just unprofessional however this isn't a major issue.

What would you like to achieve with this appeal: The original report to be instated for all guilty parties and for my character's NVFL to be removed.

What could you have done better?: I could have RP'd better and worked with Wolf pack and not been as stubborn along with not argued with the over the report.


Edited by Drew7822

Share this post

Link to post

Greetings @Drew7822,

We have reviewed your appeal. After looking into your NVFL Punishment, you received a warning for this and cannot be overturned since it is a warning with zero points. This is considered a caution and is not able to be appealed. As for your Character being Permed, since you received a caution for the NVFL you will still be allowed to play your character. Please just don't let it happen again in the future. Now after reviewing the two appeals and the original report. We have come to the conclusion and have overturned the original verdict. This is the new ruling for the verdict. You say "I'm a bit thirsty" which doesn't show that you are about to die due to dehydration. They state that they aren't going to give you any water until you answer their question. Which you are not answering in full and the hostage takers realized that. They did not threaten your life and say if you pull out anything to drink or eat they will kill you. All they stated was to keep moving and that they weren't going to give you anything to drink at the current time because your failure to answer the question in full. Now you had food and drink on you which you had access to and were able to keep your character hydrated and healthy with the supplies you had. Them stating they are not going to give you a drink is not a reason for you to not use the supplies you had to keep you character hydrated. With that being said the verdict will stay overturned and @Drew7822 will receive a caution for NVFL with the ability to still play their character.

Signed by myself

Share this post

Link to post
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...