Jump to content
Server time (UTC): 2019-11-13, 23:50
Sign in to follow this  
Kyle_Lucian

Black Roses Review

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Why the verdict was unfair: Players should be able to review groups with both positive and negative information so that new players can make accurate decisions based on historical reviews of groups

Additional Statements: When members of a group tell you to avoid a leader by logging off, when a leader promotes immersion/game breaking policies, when a leader of a group or group leadership is very young or immature, when a leader has a habit of childish or immature behavior and much more these things should be able to be reviewed by members or prior members of a group. Only allowing positive posts in group recruitment gives a very bias perspective for new members, and does not allow them to make accurate decisions on joining a group.

What would you like to achieve with this appeal?: Removal of warning points for review of Black Roses. Additionally I want my original review (Attached) to be re-posted in the black roses forum. Members can respond to it as they see fit, but it will allow future members to have something to base their decisions on outside of "this great group lead by an excellent member of the community".  

What could i have done better? : Had more information and only joined Black Roses once MouseWB left the group or was no long in a leadership role. In addition DayZRP could have allowed past members who been members of Black Roses or have played with MouseWB to have reviewed him giving other players proper information of who they are playing with both IC and OOC as with his personality there is no difference. Having that information would have avoided this along with several other issues that Black Roses has been reported for recently. It would also stop members from joining a group seeing the immaturity of community leaders and leaving the server. If you call the group for what it is and make it clear that a child is leading it, and that members avoid him like a plague then the new member would at least understand what they are signing up for. It would be of no surprise when he states breaking immersion is fine, and tries to disrupt what makes the server a valued place to play. Getting constantly reported and involved in BS dramatic rule/immersion breaking situations would be expected... because well the information was already out there and you signed up anyway.

 

be420754a590b92bffcade5aa38175aa.png.8c538f66d13e9da92dd2e36d2d45b12f.png

Edited by Kyle_Lucian
Told To By Staff

Share this post


Link to post

@Kyle_Lucian you need to edit your original post with the changes you want to make to the appeal.

Share this post


Link to post

Greetings @Kyle_Lucian, a separate team of staff have reviewed your appeal and come to a conclusion. While it is true that feedback given to groups should be allowed to be both positive and negative, the manner in which you conducted itself does not constitute as feedback, and more as flaming. Several times throughout your post you personally attack MouseWB, saying he acts like an autistic 10 year old, insult his intelligence, among other things. Furthermore the fact that you consider dragging someone through the mud as feedback is greatly alarming, and I would hope that you will take the points and learn from them rather than continue such behavior. That being said...

 

//Appeal denied. Points remain

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...