Jump to content
Server time (UTC): 2020-10-31, 16:07 HALLOWEEN SALE
Sign in to follow this  
JasonBR

Anarchy And Their Total Domination

Recommended Posts

Why does this need a thread? just send it towards an admin or an lm.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Eagle said:

Why does this need a thread? just send it towards an admin or an lm.

so other people can get a solid look at the issues and voice their opinion.

Share this post


Link to post

This is legit Dejavue of the Black fangs lmao

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, BSJasonGames said:

The weapons embargo severely crosses a line between RP and PVP

what?

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Saints said:

This is legit Dejavue of the Black fangs lmao

Multiple of my members said the same thing

Share this post


Link to post
13 minutes ago, BSJasonGames said:

- snip -

To be honest I disagree with everything you are saying. Everything they've done makes sense IC. The Socialists submitted to Anarchy, and the weapons embargo comes after a number of groups (mine included) attempted to launch a coup. They don't trust other groups, or indiviudals, so disarming them is the solution. It makes sense.

Furthermore, Anarchy, from what I've seen, isn't the Mujahadeen. They don't initiate for pvp, but for roleplay. At least in my experience. 

EDIT: VDV did this exact same thing, and that was some of the best RP I ever had. VDV were group of the year for a reason. 

As LouieRP says:

The reason for the Weapons Embargo is to stop any uprising against Anarchy and the Socialists. Why would we let multiple groups carry automatics just to come kills us? This is all IC and can be sorted ya know IC. 

Edited by Sylva

Share this post


Link to post

I'm not going to go into their group goals, though they do seem oddly unlike anarchy in some aspects, I'll agree.

As for the embargo, I see it as an IC power move that, sadly, has some very negative IC effects. I died to wolves yesterday, because all I had was a gun. It's fine, I don't mind dying. After I respawned and till now, I've been attacked by wolves a total of 5 times. Yes, that is a rarity, but I've only come away from those because I had to make an OOC decision that I didn't want to be running back from the coast due to wolves once or twice every day, so I'm actually carrying a weapon now anyway, even though it feels OOC for my dear, dear Sal. If wolves hadn't been as big an issue, and if this didn't mean the server had to now split pistol ammo so much more tightly, I'd be fine with it, but this has ramifications far outside of just IC power moves.

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Saints said:

This is legit Dejavue of the Black fangs lmao

What? explain please I'm curious how an anarchy group is in any way similar to the Black Fangs?

Edited by Eagle

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Eagle said:

What? explain please I'm curious how an anarchy group is in any way similar to the black fangs?

Talking about the thread. Like how the black fangs had threads against them and there overpower. 

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, LouieRP said:

The reason for the Weapons Embargo is to stop any uprising against Anarchy and the Socialists. Why would we let multiple groups carry automatics just to come kills us? This is all IC and can be sorted ya know IC. 

You do not have to follow this and if you have an issue with the group goals then put in some Group Feedback Here and the group leader will sort it out since our storylines are advancing quicker than expected. 

Primarily The Socialists are the ones dealing with the Weapons Embargo and we are still following our goals hence why we have Novy set up.

Nobody in the community is forced to follow this Weapons Embargo this is all done through roleplay its completely optional. 

If anyone else has an issue PM me or hit me up on Teamspeak :-) 

 

here you say automatics in the radio thread it says anything but a pistol. Which one is the real terms if i may ask?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, LouieRP said:

The reason for the Weapons Embargo is to stop any uprising against Anarchy and the Socialists. Why would we let multiple groups carry automatics just to come kills us? This is all IC and can be sorted ya know IC. 

You do not have to follow this and if you have an issue with the group goals then put in some Group Feedback Here and the group leader will sort it out since our storylines are advancing quicker than expected. 

Primarily The Socialists are the ones dealing with the Weapons Embargo and we are still following our goals hence why we have Novy set up.

Nobody in the community is forced to follow this Weapons Embargo this is all done through roleplay its completely optional. 

If anyone else has an issue PM me or hit me up on Teamspeak :-) 

 

We are kinda forced to as you have almost 50 people (including alliances) enforcing this embargo and at least 20 of them are pvpers (cough @NateRP, mad respect cough). There really isn't a choice to follow it or not.

Edited by BSJasonGames

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, BSJasonGames said:

We are kinda forced to as you have almost 50 people (including alliances) enforcing this embargo and at least 20 of them are pvpers (cough NateRP, mad respect cough). There really isn't a choice to follow it or not.

There is always a choice. VDV had half the map and there was still a choice. This is RP man. Deal with it IC.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, BSJasonGames said:

We are kinda forced to as you have almost 50 people (including alliances) enforcing this embargo and at least 20 of them are pvpers (cough NateRP, mad respect cough). There really isn't a choice to follow it or not.

If people didn't try to build an army to come kill us this wouldn't be a thing its all done through roleplay man. We have 22 people in Anarchy and not all of them are super active I have about 5-6 guys with me average so yeah.

This will not be a permanent thing it just makes sense with the current storyline. Goals and all that will be updated and stuff in the future our leader is a busy man so give him some time. 

 

Share this post


Link to post

It's no news Anarchy doesn't follow their goals and are hypocrital in their name and actions sure, yeah... But to worry about the embargo OOC? Might be stretching it a bit... 

Share this post


Link to post
9 minutes ago, BSJasonGames said:

We are kinda forced to as you have almost 50 people (including alliances) enforcing this embargo and at least 20 of them are pvpers (cough NateRP, mad respect cough). There really isn't a choice to follow it or not.

I mean I was only there for a bit but wasn't the entire weapons thing caused by multiple groups meeting up to form an army against Anarchy? Wouldn't it make some sense to disarm these people? Added on with the fact of theres tons of ways to go about this . Have barrel stashes with your automatics. Hide them in there when you goto populated areas. Get automatics that can fit in backpacks. Have other people carry them for you, bribe anarchist guards to let you off, etc. Theres a lotta ways to handle this outside of going on the forums tbh.

edit- I do agree tho the group goals need to be changed or followed more as ye they aren't being followed.

Edited by UndeadRP

Share this post


Link to post

Yeh, I'm not a huge fan of the whole weapons taking jargon, its been done n stoof.. ah well.

I also agree with the OP, it goes against our Core Group goals.

Edited by JoffreyRP

Share this post


Link to post

This takes me back but at the same time does not

Share this post


Link to post
13 minutes ago, JimRP said:

About the embargo we have been preparing it for weeks lol.

I don't think its the lack of IC/OOC preparation that is in question here...

Edited by MeenMuginLovin
Haven't englished in a while...

Share this post


Link to post

Sounds like a repeat of last summer to be perfectly honest, in the sense that people will have an issue with one group being more powerful than most others. I get it might conflict with the core goals at certain points, but gun confiscation isn't completely unrealistic, could be done within certain areas though. (might already be I'm not familiar with the embargo)

Seems like there is a lot of uproar over stuff and groups like this but with little actual IC pushback, although that is separate from the issue at hand.

Share this post


Link to post
3 minutes ago, Major said:

 

Seems like there is a lot of uproar over stuff and groups like this but with little actual IC pushback.

"little IC Pushback" let me know when you can handle the numbers fronted considering 2/3 of the server would be said alliance.

Haven't got any issues with what they're doing, just bag shit and don't open carry.. Simple to avoid.

Spoiler

AnarchyRoster.png.4075bf1cd5f050d3b463982b128c3081.png + the 19 characters on SSZ Roster

 

Edited by Mexi

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Mexi said:

"little IC Pushback" let me know when you can handle the numbers fronted considering 2/3 of the server would be said alliance.

Haven't got any issues with what they're doing, just bag shit and don't open carry.. Simple to avoid.

  Reveal hidden contents

AnarchyRoster.png.4075bf1cd5f050d3b463982b128c3081.png

 

I think it would be better if the two groups agreed to a territory separation and just created two towns or territories under some sort of truce, but that's just my analysis. 

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Major said:

I think it would be better if the two groups agreed to a territory separation and just created two towns or territories under some sort of truce, but that's just my analysis. 

Major when you got time come talk to me on Teamspeak and we will sort this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...