Unnecessary Post Pandemic

[Ryan Shepherd]

Link to the source of punishment (report/post):

Why the verdict is not fair: 
The group thread is literally based around vehicles and their use which was the topic of discussion.

Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view:
I recieved an unnecessary post for responding to @Rutkiy regarding his driving, which is what his group partakes in. I don't see how it is an unnecessary post at all? Responding to someones comment on a group thread. If you take a look at any group posted the first page literally consists of 'lets go' posts which seem to be a trend but seem to bypass the UP ruling but an actual discussion is an UP? Right. It seems to me this person recently got their forum powers and were rather excited to start dishing out points to impress.

What would you like to achieve with this appeal:

Points removed.

What could you have done better?:
Nothing.

[Duplessis]

Hello @Ryan Shepherd,

A separate portion of the staff team has reviewed your appeal and decided to ACCEPT IT.

This post in question was indeed on topic to the group thread, as well to an ongoing conversation on it. The post itself was not low quality, and was responding to the post of another community member as well as your own previous post.

With the above said,
Appeal accepted - warning points removed.

Signed by @Duplessis and @PaulB