Sapphire groovy blisna Posted May 5, 2020 Sapphire Share Posted May 5, 2020 (edited) Link to the source of punishment (report/post): Why the verdict is not fair: I believe the verdict isn't fair as when i was stopped i was tunnel visioned on that i was being stopped by the one man. I had no clue that the other drew guns just the one following me. In my Pov i did say the only a single Gun was drawn. From the follower. I might have said Guns but i edited it to Gun because it was only one (From my eyes. ). The one man had a security armband on making him the only one with that on. The other two had Blue armbands. I didn't know IC or OOC that these had any correlation. I dont think ive ever met these people IC and that they were friends. So when i killed the *security* I didn't know that other people would join in. When you say i played by the rules i only did what i thought was right at the moment in killing the only aggressor i saw point a gun at me. What ever the Blue armbands mean i didn't know if they were allies. Passer bys. or what ever. I could have never known they were going to fire upon me. Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view: Ive never had any IC knowledge that they were friends. Ruleplay never went through my mind in that situation. Because if all of them were wearing the same armband i would have complied even if only one of them had initiated. What im trying to say is i just didnt know they were friends. I was talking with the *Security* for maybe like 4-6mins or something before he got straight to the Hand Cuffs What would you like to achieve with this appeal: Unbanned. Points removed. Character Reset removed. What could you have done better?: look at a situation better Edited May 6, 2020 by Blisna typos, couple more things to add Link to comment
Guest Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Greetings @Blisna, A separate team of staff members have looked over your appeal and have decided to deny it. The NVFL : As Rule 3.2 states : Quote Your character must behave realistically and appropriately to the different situations you participate in, keeping the current world situation and context of post-apocalyptic world in mind. Do not act in a way that indicates no value for your characters life and survival. For example, attempting to kill people when heavily outnumbered, excessively talking back or insulting someone when taken hostage, or knowingly running into an area of active hostile engagement when not involved in the fight. Characters found guilty of breaking this rule will be permanently marked as dead. Your character was outnumbered 3 to 1, although you were only in direct contact with one person, you should've assumed the other 2 hanging around were working with him or supporting him in some manner. You couldn't have known their relationships, thus you should've went for the safest way and comply and see what happened next. The Ruleplay As Rule 3.3 states: Quote You may not focus on out of character gains to the detriment of RP. For example, "rule play" is prioritizing things like kill rights or OOC information above more appropriate IC actions or behavior. Always prioritize role play over rule play. Looking at your appeal, we can understand better how you and mainly your character perceived the whole situation and we understand that you acted based on your instincts rather than on OOC knowledge. As a suggestion, it would be best when writing your POV, to be as clear and thorough as possible as to avoid situations like this. From this we decided to lower your punishment from 5 days and 10 points to 3 days and 10 points (Standard NVFL Punishment). Your character reset and permanent death still stay. With this said the outcome of this appeal will be : Appeal denied - Punishment adjusted to 3 day ban and 10 warning points. Signed by, @Woodzie and @Inferno Link to comment
Recommended Posts