Jump to content
Server time (UTC): 2019-12-11, 15:14 WE ARE RECRUITING
Sign in to follow this  
Ryan Shepherd

Roundabout Flaming Hours

Recommended Posts

Link to the source of punishment (report/post): 

Spoiler

Screenshot_2.png.ce3454a53d28262bf96eed576fc44b6b.png.c30f881681707faa48f073e663d3e779.png

 

Why the verdict is not fair:

In a 2.3 report against myself and my compadre's, @Burak claimed we were attacking him constantly, during the report I asked him a simple question:

Spoiler

ca27eee18b7e4475bdf2b4425769668e.png.196b19ae2efeebdd13136e6386494b8b.png

Which was extremely important. @Burak insisted on not answering this three times:

Spoiler

73b1a43af14ff841ede2bfc2465d46e7.png.ce8f859b36f2279c811c2f1f41eac4d6.png

191278046_2c35dacf391d79a7139a156751ec049a(1).png.f76e7126c1fc10ba409ee4f6b17efd8e.png

6e639d947663f10601acbc0ceba5a666.png.d15a2f508583d30f7f452af048333a04.png

Staff did not intervene even though I asked him 3 times, ultimately I was frustrated and said: 

Spoiler

Screenshot_2.png.ce3454a53d28262bf96eed576fc44b6b.png.c30f881681707faa48f073e663d3e779.png

I said his life is like a roundabout, reason being, he kept refusing to answer the report breaking questions in an attempt to pull the wool over staff's eyes in order for the report to go his way. I called him a roundabout as a joke insinuating, everytime I asked him, he went off in a spiral about something irrelevant avoiding the question. I then received the following:

Spoiler

c86fabc1dd86cf6659a6ea01f3b2594c.png.f069a69acc18221cda2bf9b56072fcff.png

In no way was I directly speaking about his life and @Scarlett describing to me that I do not know what is going on in his life, like what? Why did I receive points for insinuating that someone is avoiding questions like a roundabout, in what world is that flame? 

These points are also valid until 01/05/20 which is 6 months from now.  Like... what? Why is 6 months warranted?

Additional statements/comments explaining your point of view: 

I am confused as to why I can not call someone out for attempting to pervert the course of justice in a report by avoiding important questions.

What would you like to achieve with this appeal:

Points removed

What could you have done better?: 

Nothing.

Edited by Ryan Shepherd

Share this post


Link to post

Greetings @Ryan Shepherd,

A different group of Staff Members have looked over your appeal. After looking over your appeal we have come to the conclusion to accept it. We don't see this as flaming you were stating something that was happening in the report to show what is happening to the Staff Members who are looking at the report. With that said your warning points have been revoked.


Appeal Accepted: Warning Points Revoked

Signed by Myself w/ Notes

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...