Jamie

Administrator
  • Content count

    2527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

451 Regular

About Jamie

  • Birthday 11/06/97

Personal Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

1269 profile views
  • Kain

  • Nicho

  • groovy tony

  • PatZ

  1. I'm killing the fun now. Rolle does not approve of the bread pictures, especially from last time. Keep the thread on topic and not on bread. Thanks.
  2. Perhaps instead of smart remarks, you could address the points I made above. Thanks. Edit: If the topic is regarding the whitelist revoke, then I would understand. But you keep referring to a standard, but as Oliv cleared up, there is none. in some cases It is never black and white when it comes to BadRP and requires discussion. Some cases are obvious BadRP, some aren't.
  3. The standard procedure is if someone has been whitelisted and receives a 5 day ban within the first month of playing, they have a whitelist revoke. It's standard, and not special for this particular report. I'm really not understanding this thread. As you know, a report comes up and several staff members give an opinion on it, along with a verdict. In this case, a majority of the staff team including myself, deemed the situation BadRP. Why would we issue a verbal when they broke the rule? If they had KOS'ed someone, we would not issue a verbal because they are new. Like I said in an earlier post, all I saw in this video was 3 minutes of dead end conversations. If they said they were robbing for gear, why did they try and cover it up with saying "they wanted to do research"? We've had several threads pop up in the past that we were being far too lenient when it came to newcomers. When we moved away from this attitude and treated everyone the same, we're still not doing things right? There is nothing wrong with this particular scenario. They will have learnt from the situation and put more effort into their next encounter.
  4. Looking through that video, the Roleplay was poor. They initiated and within seconds, all 3 had their heads staring into his chest, looking through all the gear he had. The dialogue was minimal. Yes, you are allowed to rob for gear as long as you can back it up with solid roleplay. Robberies with sufficient roleplay should not last 3 minutes, perhaps more of a personal opinion then anything. Also, I don't like the fact that when the OP and one of the accused were talking, he was cut of mid sentence with an initiating, stopping that potential build up to more reason behind the robbery instead of saying "we're only doing research" when they did not even "research" him. There was a potential path to take the roleplay down but they didn't even take it. If I was the OP of that report, I would also report them. As for the comments made about robbing for gear, it's allowed as long as you can actually give some solid roleplay to back it up.
    • Lil_Beefy
    •   
    • Jamie

    lets try this again james

    hello

    1. Show previous comments  10 more
    2. Jamie

      Jamie

      they do tbh.

       

      hood night.

    3. Lil_Beefy

      Lil_Beefy

      lmao thats a meme

    4. Tosh

      Tosh

      0608956b0a.png

      d0f69d2f36.png

  5. Fixed.
  6. Yeah, I'm not gonna dodge around the fact. I'm not equally spreading my work out, and I should be focusing more work towards the Ban Appeals. There is a few different tasks, white lists, e-mails, e.t.c and I could be looking at the ban appeals far more, as seeing by your statistics. You're completely right in saying that Terra does a lot of the work. Heck, that's the biggest understatement. All I can say is, I take this feedback on-board and spread the work equally between the tasks, and relieve Terra of the workload she does. Thank you for the Feedback. @Ron @Echo
    • Lil_Beefy
    •   
    • Jamie

    hello

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Jamie

      Jamie

      it's always too late

    3. Lil_Beefy

      Lil_Beefy

      im sorry james

      maybe another day

    4. Jamie
    • Vapor
    •   
    • Jamie

    James you filthy whore. You just follow me, the great Vapor!

    1. Jamie

      Jamie

      No idea who you are, you had a V in your name so you seemed cool till I realized. 

       

      :^)

    2. Vapor

      Vapor

      Oh. Suck thee cock.

  7. I will give you my insight onto how things were operated. Myself and another team looked into the case, and bare in mind that Welden was appealing his most recent punishment being Ruleplay. We looked into the Ruleplay accusations and spent a lot of time discussing whether he was in proper conditions to use it rights or not, and whether he had anything to back up the use of his rights. We came to the conclusion that it made sense roleplay wise since his friend Batok was sniped. It would make sense, eye for an eye. Now, we also noticed how we did not agree with the Powergame verdict. But, since we were addressing Ruleplay in his appeal, we handled the Ruleplay first in his appeal and then overturned the verdict to keep things clear, instead of accepting his appeal and then going onto giving him another punishment in the same appeal. Perhaps can come across as "sloppy" but it does not to me. Moving on, there was a solid basis for why Welden received a powergame punishment which was listed in the reasoning of the verdict which I wrote, which perhaps you did or did not read. In the chat logs, the only permission which was asked OOC was for the scarring which is markings on the skin. There was no permission for dismemberment, which consists of removing body parts. Now, it states in the rules that you must be granted with specific permission, meaning you need to be unambiguous with regards to what you're going to be performing. Welden did not in this case which is why he was punished with Powergame. But now, moving onto your argument. It states very clearly that the hostage takers are the ones responsible for their actions, asking for permission or whatnot. It does not state anywhere that the hostage should say OOCly that they do not want to be permascarred. With that mentality, the hostage takers could do what they like and can only be stopped by OOC denial. This is not how the rules are worded. If I was dragged into the woods and being told repeatedly that they were going to slice my feet off, would it be my responsibility to say OOCly that I do not want this to happen or their responsibility because they must ask OOCly. But anyway, I do see your reasoning and I did mention that in the verdict. They could have said OOC that they did not wish for the scars, but by the rules it is not required of them. And apologies if it may appeared sloppy, it seemed efficient to me and still does. Thank you for the feedback.
  8. DOING GOOD
    • Lil_Beefy
    •   
    • Jamie

    Nice try James but André is MINE

    1. Show previous comments  20 more
    2. Tosh

      Tosh

    3. Jamie

      Jamie

      I paid for membership, you scammed me.

    4. Whip

      Whip

      get memed

  9. But I only fell out my door onto the snow. I got up and I am primed an ready for action. :^)
  10. How do you not like popcorn? Weirdo. 

    1. Terra

      Terra

      Leave me alone ...Stalker!