Jamie

Administrator
  • Content count

    2599
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Song

Community Reputation

507 Veteran

About Jamie

  • Birthday 11/06/97

Personal Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

2175 profile views
  • Chief

  • Hatch

  • Masulii

  • Shane

  • Giraffel

  1. You guys are doing such a great job
  2. I FEEL THE HATE
    • Ellie
    •   
    • Jamie

    HI JAMES. WHY IS YOUR PROFILE ALL ABOUT HALLOWEEN. ITS FUCKING FEBRUARY.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Ellie

      Ellie

      I'm disappointed. 

    3. Jamie

      Jamie

      There you go. No more pumpkins. 

    4. Ellie

      Ellie

      +1 ^_^

  3. For once, everyone who plays on our servers must be an RPer. :^) Now, it'd be somewhat hard to pull off without seeming trolly. You have to look into the conditions that he'll have. It's always best to do research upon the different conditions and their side effects. A lot of people try "crazy" characters and execute them poorly because no real research had gone into it. Would he have stumbled upon this Knight mentality through perhaps reading a book? Ancestors? Perhaps refer to an actual battle that occurred in the past, 1066 or something. If you look into these things, it'd still be hard to pull off. If you are dedicated, then give it a go. Best of luck.
  4. Honestly, the minority ruin it for the majority. These rules have been set up for a reason. The Admin team nor Rolle want to make this place into a desolate graveyard where no fun is allowed. We need to moderate the forums and keep it a civil place. There are individuals that like to push the boundaries and cause trouble. When we deal with them accordingly, we have to treat everyone the same. If someone posts a funny joke/meme/gif on a discussion thread with no context to the situation, it's more than likely gonna receive points. It's a serious discussion forum. If you joke around in offtopic, there is a certain degree of leniency, since this is actually the only forum took with a pinch of salt (Not that salt). You also have the status updates which also seem to have a lot of leniency also, so I actually don't see the problem. If we were going to be real assholes, we would moderate the entire forums like we do with ban appeals and reports, then this place would be a real graveyard. Like I read in Cipher's introduction thread, there will always be certain people that will always push the boundaries, no matter. If everyone acted maturely and accordingly to everything, even with a joke here and there, we would not even need to moderate the forums. I'm sure a lot of you are, but not everyone is, unfortunately. Just my 2 cents on the matter.
  5. Hello Community, We have had discussion within the team with regards to the Whitelist Revoke for members that receive a 5 day or more ban and have been whitelisted for 1 month or less. The reason this rule is in place is so that we can limit the people who actually want to take our servers seriously. Within your first month of whitelisting, the rules should be fresh in your mind and this method of punishment was to ensure that those who did not understand the rules were made aware how important they are, even if it may be harsh making them go through the entire process again. We have looked at the concerns brought up and have decided to alter the rule. Instead of a 5 day ban+, we are going to raise the limit to 7 day ban. With this, it would cover KOS, Trolling and Lying in a report. We decided that some people may make mistakes their first month, for example, BadRP. We don't see this as severe as the 7-day punishments and come to the conclusion that they can learn from the standard BadRP punishment. With the 7-day ban punishments, they should have no excuse for doing that in their first month. This takes effect as of now. Thanking you. The Admins.
  6. Are you suggesting that we eliminate text roleplayers? No. Some people actually have a mic but prefer to roleplay via text to deliver their character in a far better way. I know some great text roleplayers a sterling job. So what if you have to wait a few seconds for them to type while running? If we limited to microphone use only, then it would restrict people of roleplaying who they want. Perhaps they want to roleplay a character with a different language to their own, text roleplay allows it. If you wanted to roleplay a different gender but don't feel you can crack the voice? Text roleplay allows that. There is no harm that you dislike text roleplayers. Waiting a few seconds can be quite daunting. But because of this, you want to put a ban on it? No.
    • MapleMooses
    •   
    • Jamie

    Mogwai! xD

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. MapleMooses

      MapleMooses

      Sames. Alongside Explosions in the Sky.  xD

    3. Jamie

      Jamie

      Never heard of them. Just checked them out and I'm pretty impressed. Same feeling as Mogwai, perhaps a bit more lighter. Gonna look into them more, ty chick :P

    4. MapleMooses

      MapleMooses

      You're welcome :3

    • Jamie
    •   
    • Ellie

    Do it.

    1. Winslow
    2. Ellie

      Ellie

      I'm dead

    3. Winslow
    • Jamie
    •   
    • Vapor

    sp00ky

    1. Vapor

      Vapor

      ty

    • Vapor
    •   
    • Jamie

    edgy

  7. But you could literally do paragraphs and paragraphs of emotes, but the only thing that actually gets transmitted is what you're saying plus the sounds you make. It's about the actual content of what is said over the radio, not what book your reading or painting your looking at whilst you say the transmission. People have received points for not actually contributing anything besides emotes. The emotes are good to give the reader some background behind the character saying the transmission, but it's purely on an OOC basis. The main focus should be the IC content.
  8. As people may be well aware, the radio chatter turned into a meme place where people were constantly posting stuff which didn't contribute at all. 1 worded responses, trolling, discouraging responses etc. The reason the new rule was implemented was to cut down on the petty shit which led to nearly all radio chatters leading nowhere. When someone posted something about needing help, the replies would be 2-word responses only saying fuck off. There's a lot of examples, but you get the idea. With your situation regarding the points you received, it's clear Lukzo put some time into creating the thread and was hoping for some roleplay to spiral from it. You replying with "nah" doesn't build up anything. Yes, it makes him aware that you don't want to go to Lopatino but no effort was gone into the reply. If you had constructed up a better reply with some more context instead of no, then you wouldn't have received points. Ryan picks up the radio. Hey, little shit. Give me one good fucking reason for meeting you. I've got no interests at all. You're a slimy shit and you should fuck off. He puts down the radio. This adds a stepping stone for the OP to reply with instead of just "nah." If you put actual effort into the transmissions you do, there's a higher chance you won't receive points. If you're not liking the current rules, come up with alternatives which also avoid the points I mentioned in the first paragraph.
  9. Always brought up excellent points whilst being in staff and out. Very productive community member and will be missed. I'm not gonna say bye since I'll see you around anyway. *tips fedora*